X

Looks like you are a new visitor to this site. Hello!

Welcome to Hope For Film! Come participate in the discussion, and I encourage you to enter your email address in the sidebar and subscribe. It's free! And easy! If you have any suggestions on how to improve this website or suggestions for topics please don't hesitate to write in to any of the blogs.

You can also follow me on Twitter or Facebook.

(If you keep getting this message, you probably have cookies turned off.)

September 28 at 1:31pm

Film Independent’s Filmmaker Forum’s Keynote Speech

I was the keynote speaker at Film Independent’s Filmmaker Forum yesterday in Los Angeles.  This is the full text of my speech.  And it is the final draft, as an earlier draft got posted a few places accidently.

 

A THOUSAND PHOENIX RISING

“How The New Truly Free Filmmaking Community Will Rise From Indie’s Ashes
Film Independent Filmmakers’ Forum Keynote 9/27/08

I can’t talk about the “crisis” of the indie film industry. There is no crisis. The country is in crisis. The economy is in crisis. We, the filmmakers, aren’t in crisis.

The business is changing, but for us –us who are called Indie Filmmakers — that’s good that the business is changing. Filmmaking is an incredible privilege and we need to accept it as such – and accept the full responsibility that comes with that privilege.

The proclamations of Indie Film’s demise are grossly exaggerated. How can there be a “Death Of Indie” when Indie — real Indie, True Indie — has yet to even live?

Yes, there’s a profound paradigm shift, and that shift is the coming of true independence. The hope of this new independence is being threatened even before it has arrived. Are we going to fight for our independence and can we even shoulder the responsibility that independence requires? That is: will we ban together and work for our communal needs? Are we ready to leave dreams of stardom and wealth behind us?

When someone says, “Indie is dead”, they are talking about the state of the Indie Film Business, as opposed to what are actually the films themselves. They can say “The sky is falling” because for the last fifteen years, the existing power base in the film industry has focused on films fit for the existing business model, as opposed to ever truly concentrating on creating a business model for the films that filmmakers want to make.

This is where we are right now: on the verge of a TRULY FREE FILM CULTURE, one that is driven by both the creators and the audiences, pulled down by the audience and not pushed onto them by those that control the apparatus and the supply. We now have the power and this remarkable tool for something different, but will we fight to preserve the Internet, the tool that offers us our new freedom? Can we banish the dream of golden distribution deals, and move away from asking others to distribute and market it for us? Can we accept that being a filmmaker means taking responsibility for your films, the primary responsibility, all the way through the process? That is independence and that is freedom.

Indie, True Indie, is in its infancy. The popular term “Indie” is a distortion, growing out of our communal laziness and complacency – our willingness to be marketed blandly and not specifically. Our culture is vast and diverse, and we need to celebrate these differences, not diminish them. It’s time to put that term “Indie” to rest.

Independence is within our reach, but we but we have to do what we have never done before: we have to choose.

It’s a lot like the Presidential election. And it’s also a lot like psychotherapy: we have to ask ourselves if the pain we are experiencing presently is enough to motivate us to overcome the fear inherent in change itself.

We have to change our behavior and make that choice. We have to choose the type of culture we want. We have to choose the type of films we want available to us. We have to choose whether the Internet is the corporations or ours. We have to choose whether we decide for ourselves whether a film is worthwhile or whether we let those same corporations decide. We have to choose who are audiences are and how we are to reach them. We have to choose how we can all best contribute to this new system. And as we act on those choices, we have to get others to make a choice too.

For the last fifteen years our Community has made huge strides at demystifying the production process and providing access to the financing and distribution gatekeepers. Some call this democratization, but it is not. This demystification of production was a great first step, but it is not give the filmmaker real power; generally speaking we are still there with our hat in our hands. In some ways, understanding the great behemoth that is production is also a distraction. It has distracted us from making really good films. And as it has distracted us from gaining the knowledge and seizing the power that is available to us. We have learned how to make films and how to bring them to market. We now have to demystify how to market and distribute films, and to do it in a way truly suited to the films we are making and desire to make.

Don’t get me wrong the last fifteen years have been great. The Indie Period – as I suspect history will call it — has brought us a far more diverse array of films than we had previously. It got better; we got more choices – but that is still not freedom. We are still in a damn similar place to the way it was back when cinema was invented 100 years ago. And it’s time we moved to a new term, to the period of a Truly Free Film Culture.

If we want the freedom to tell the stories we want to tell, we all have to start to contribute to build the infrastructure that can support them. We need to step back from the glamour of making all these films, and instead help each other build the links, articulate the message, make the commitments, that will turn us truly into a Truly Free Film community. We have to stop making so many films.

The work before us is a major readjustment that will require many sacrifices. We must redesign the business structure for what the films actually are. We have to recognize that a Truly Free Film Culture is quite different from Studio Films and even different from the prestige film that the specialized distributors make. But look at what we gain: we will stop self-censoring our work to fit a business model that was appropriated from Hollywood and their mass market films to begin with. We will reach out to the audiences that are hungry for something new, for something truthful, for something about the world they experience, for something that is as complex as the emotions they feel. We can let them guide us because for the first time we can have real access and contact with them.

Presently, we are divided and conquered by a system that preys upon our dreams of success, encouraging us to squander collective progress on false hopes of personal enrichment. We follow the herd and only lead reluctantly. If we want Truly Free Films we have to stop dreaming of wealth, and take the job of building the community and support system.

For the last decade and a half, we have been myopically focused on production. Using Sundance submissions as a barometer, our production ability has increased eight and half times over — 850% — from 400 to 3600 films in fifteen years.

C’mon! What are we doing? Wasting a tremendous amount of energy, talent, and brainpower – that much is clear. If the average budget of Sundance submissions is $500K, that means the aggregate production costs are $1.8 billion dollars a year. That’s a hell of a lot of money to lose annually. And you can bet the Indie World isn’t going to get a government bail out like Wall Street and the Banking Industry have.

We need to recognize the responsibility of telling unique stories in unique ways. We are frequently innovators and groundbreakers, but that brings additional responsibilities. Working at the intersection of art and commerce requires consideration for those that come after us. It is our responsibility to do all within our power to deliver a positive financial return. If we lose money, it is a lot harder for those that follow us. With a debt of $1.8 billion per annum you can bet it will be a lot harder for a lot of people. And it should be – but it didn’t need to be.

We don’t get better films or build audiences by picking up cameras. Despite this huge boom in production, the number of truly talented uniquely voiced auteurs produced annually remains unchanged. What’s happened instead is the infrastructure has rusted, the industry has failed to innovate, and we are standing on a precipice begging the giant to banish us into oblivion. Rebuilding that infrastructure, bringing good work to hungry audiences is a far greater glory than another celluloid trophy for only you to stare at.

There is a silver lining too in this dark cloud of over production that they like to call The Glut. As a young man I never found peace until I moved to New York City; the calm I found in New York, is explained by a line of Woody Allen’s: “in New York, you always know what you are missing”. What’s great about a surplus of options – and we have that now, and not just from movies, but also from the web, from books, from games – what’s great is that you have to make a choice. You have to commit. And you have to commit in advance.

The business model of the current entertainment industry is predicated on consumers not making choices but acting on impulses. Choice comes from research, from knowledge, and from tastes. Speak to someone from Netflix, and they will tell you that the longer someone is a member, the more their tastes move to auteurs, to quality film. Once we all wake up and realize that with films, as frankly with everything, we have to be thoughtful, and tastes will change. We have to make it a choice, a choice for, and not an impulse.

We are now in a cultural war and not just the red state/blue state, participate vs. obey kind, not just the kind of cultural war that politicians seem to want to break this country down to. We are in a culture war in terms of what we get to see, enjoy and make. The Lovers Of Cinema have been losing this war because the Makers have invested in a dream of Prince Charming, content to have him sweep down, pick us up, and sing that rags to riches refrain even if it comes but once a year to one lucky filmmaker out of 3,600.

So what is this TRULY FREE FILM CULTURE I am proposing? It is one that utilizes first and foremost the remarkable tool that is The Internet. It is the internet that transforms the culture business from a business that is based around limited supply and the rule of gatekeepers to a business that around the fulfillment of all audience desire, and not just the desire of mass audiences, but also of the niches.

We have never had this sort opportunity before and the great tragedy is that just as we are learning what it means, forces are vying to take it away from us. The principal that all information, all creators, all audiences should be treated equally within the structure that is the Internet is popularly referred to as Net Neutrality. The Telecos, the Cable Companies, and their great ally, the Hollywood Motion Picture Studios and their MPAA are now trying to end that equality. And with it you will lose the opportunity to be TRULY FREE FILMMAKERS. But they are not going to succeed because we are going to ban together and organize; we are going to save the Internet, and keep equal access for all. Right?

A TRULY FREE FILM CULTURE will respect the audience’s needs and desires as much as Indie currently respects the filmmakers. A TRULY FREE FILM CULTURE recognizes film as a dialogue and recognizes that a dialogue requires a community. Participants in a TRULY FREE FILM CULTURE work to participate in that community, work to get others to participate in that community. We work to get others to make a choice, to make a choice about what they want to do, what they want to see. We all become curators. We all promote the films we love. We reach out and mobilize others to vote with their feet, vote with their eyes, and vote with their dollars, to not act on impulses, but on knowledge and experience.

A TRULY FREE FILMMAKER — be they producer or director — recognizes their responsibility is not just to find a good script, not just to find a good cast, a good package. A TRULY FREE FILMMAKER recognizes that they must do more than find the funding, and even more than justifying that funding. The TRULY FREE FILMMAKER now recognizes their responsibility is to also find the audience, grow the audience, expand the audience, and then also to move the audience, not just emotionally, but also literally: to move them onwards further to other things. Whether it is by direct contact, email blasts, or blogging, whatever it is, express what you want our culture to be. And express it to all you know.

The TRULY FREE FILMMAKER also recognizes that knowledge is a true power, and that ownership is a false power. The TRULY FREE FILMMAKER recognizes that others, as many others as possible, sharing in that knowledge will make everything better: the films, the apparatus, the business, and the just plain pleasure of participating. We are walking into new territory and we best map it out together.

The TRULY FREE FILMMAKER is no longer bound to just the 5 or 6 reel length to tell their stories. The TRULY FREE FILMMAKER is no longer bound to projection as the primary audience platform and is not stuck on the one film one theater one-week type of release.

It is this thing that we once called the Independent Community that is the sector that truly innovates. The lower cost of our creations allows for greater risks. It is what we used to call “Indies” that has innovated on a technical level, on a content level, on a story telling approach, and it is this, the TRULY FREE FILM CULTURE that will innovate still further in the future of distribution.

With the passion that produces 3600 films a year, with just a portion of those resources, we can build a new infrastructure that opens up new audiences, new models, and new revenue streams that can build a true alternative to the mainstream culture that has been force fed us for years. We are on the verge of truly opening up what can be told, how it is told, to whom it is told, and where is told. We can seize it, but it requires that we embrace the full responsibility of what independence means.

Independence requires knowing your film inside and out. Knowing not just what you are choosing to do, but what you have chosen not to do. Independence comes with knowing that you have fully considered all your options. It is knowing your audience, knowing how to reach them – and not abstractly, but concretely.

I can assure you too, that this work of slowing down on our projects, learning their possibilities fully, finding their audiences, owning our audiences, not only will make our films better, but it will also get them made; for it will create that evasive air of inevitability around your projects that gets films financed. It will also lead you into the real challenge of reaching that audience and earning directly the reward of true interaction with them.

Let’s make the next ten years about seizing our independence, killing “indie” film, and bringing forth a Truly Free Film Culture.

Thank you.


  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Chris Teague

    I was the DP on a small “indie” film this summer with a tiny budget. And still, it would kill me to think that the only potential outlet for this film would be a four inch highly compressed rectangle on someone’s laptop. I don’t think that’s me being egotistical, I think it’s any artists desire to have their work shown in a format that is most conducive for an audience to properly experience the work. Part of the reason myself and the crew pour their heart and souls into their work is the hope, the assumption, the goal that the film we are making is going to be shown in a large format for a group of people to sit and watch together as a community. This may only happen a handful of times, but it’s far more satisfying and worth the effort than to think it might only be seen on the Internet. Shooting for the small frame changes entirely the way people approach filmmaking – you are saying this is a great thing, which is possibly true, but it’s also a terrible thing – look at the difference between TV and Movies and the way they are shot. Think of watching any of Gus Van Sant’s last four films for the first time on a laptop. It would be a disaster!

    Believe me, for my sake and all of my friends’ sakes, I really desperately want to believe you are right and that the internet can open all kinds of doors for us, and allow us the creative freedom we desperately hope for. I’m just having a hard time seeing how that could take shape. The cinema experience is not just an experience for placating filmmaker’s egos. It has a lot to do with experiencing cinema the way I believe it is meant to be experienced – in a group of people on a large screen.

    I hope this discussion will continue because it’s on all of our minds. I’d love to hear about solutions, conjectures, bold ideas about how to make the Internet help us make the films we want to make and find our audiences.

    Thanks

    Chris Teague

  • Matt

    Ted, thank you for putting some good energy, enthusiasm and encouragement for reappraisal out there into the (so-called) independent film world. This call-to-arms is an overdue, refreshing blast of perspective, and I hope that it inspires more dialogue amongst those of us who have chosen to get mixed-up in this business of filmmaking.

    to Chris Teague: I hear you loud and clear on the desire to have your work screened under what you consider ideal conditions, but I think it’s also important to consider the tremendously greater reach that other distro channels afford your work. And, with regard to your Van Sant comment, I’d argue that watching ELEPHANT on a laptop is its own kind of special, given that some of it is shot like a first-person shooter, which many of us first played on our PCs.

    - matt wall

  • Leo

    The emotion is overdue.
    The action is premature.

    People want to see films in the best possible circumstance, and even more importantly, filmmakers want people to see their films in the best possible circumstance. Even a 1080p HD TV playing a Bluray disc is not going to get the same emotion, the same intensity, the same level of involvement as a screening in a theater.

    I am an aspiring filmmaker. I just collaborated on a film that will be one of the 3600+ submissions to Sundance 2010, and the experience of creating the film was well worth any costs incurred, even if we get a thanks-but-no-thanks from the Festival. One of the many reasons I wanted to become a film maker is because art is dying. Classic theater exists only in privately-funded rep houses, symphony orchestras are slowly going out of business. The only form of classical entertainment that still earns money is opera, and that’s only because they charge exorbitant amounts of money to the people who do come – $50+ for a nosebleed seat in some less expensive houses. While all of these activities are still available to us, and many people do attend them, the one and only art event that is regularly attended by a significant proportion of our society is film screenings.

    It’s not really even about numbers. It’s about the experience. It’s about escaping your life for 2 hours. I don’t know about you, but watching a movie at my house – where I have the 1080p HD TV and Bluray player – never even comes close to watching the same movie in a movie theater, even a somewhat crappy one. I always know I’m at home because the phone rings, or my cat jumps into my lap, or I need to go to the bathroom so I pause the show. Call me crazy, but I like being reminded that life continues to happen when I go to the bathroom, that I can’t just press pause.

    We need ways to interact with each other in real life. If we relegate to the Internet the primary method we use to maintain our identity, our culture, then we will be delivering ourselves a huge blow. And I for one will mourn the death of film that day.

  • Uazza

    The wind of renovation that the Internet brought into the media had just began to blow.
    The Film industry grew with the growth of the digital technology, and it is unthinkable to believe it will stop easily.
    Internet and Computers changed the way of making movies AND the way of watching them. 40% of teenagers and young people, 15-24 yrs old usually use the internet while watching TV, they keep on texting on their cellphones while watching movies. I can see it, it’s under my eyes every day. You can’t fight this tendency.
    Mr Hope is right when says that we have to make movies and contents for the audience, and this is the audience: It is evolving as fast as the technology.
    Unfortunately it means that all of us will have less attention for our movies. Unfortunately that means that always less people will go to the movies, because while they are at the cinema can ONLY send SMS, instead of using another full size screen.
    So, even if I still love to forget everything for two hours, entering into a screening room, I believe movies have to be made for a new, interactive, often inattentive or less attentive audience.
    2 hours movie? I guess it won’t be the future. Especially for indies.

    Dario Figoli
    NYFA Student

  • lazulita

    All of these thoughts and concerns are valid. Are we making a small movie for a small screen, or a big movie for a big screen, or a small movie for a big screen? It’s interesting to even have to pose these relatively new questions – we are forced to think about story and audience in a way we never had to before. It’s actually a positive step towards a sense of responsibility for what we put out into the world, why, and for whom. I like to think that the answers might be somewhere in the middle, in some silvery -as opposed to gray- area.

    All of the major changes happening right now point towards community, so as long as we keep community in mix we’ll be ok. The internet is a powerful one and can’t be discounted, as much as we can agree that it does away with the experience and often the quality of watching a movie on a big screen. So I’ll add to the mix something I heard on a video panel discussion on another of Ted’s blogs: http://trulyfreefilm.blogspot.com/ (The Conversation: Live in Berkeley 10/18) about DIY/Hybrid distribution. The idea is that there’s an opportunity for film festivals to be a part of this “reform” by creating a continuum with the films shown and the audiences it attracts – there could be traveling film festivals, or year round venues with subscription models (much like is used in regional theater, which is a really great analogy). It would be a great complement to the www, and would keep the sanctuaries of our dark screening rooms alive, while building on local communities. I have no idea what the financial implications are for festivals to do this. But they have the most important element in place – the audience.

    The dream of “success” has to be redefined. We have to want to change, it’s already upon us.

    -Mariana

  • Lisa France

    Ted,

    You’re speech was highly forward thinking. While I might agree in theory, I do not think it is something that can be practiced at this time.

    Why? Largely because the democritization of filmmaking is fairly new. Being able to write, shoot, edit and present a movie with as few as 3 or 4 people is a relatively new process that can be literally done by “anyone.” Of course what Ted points to is that this is the good news and the bad news. The “anyone” quotient is what has the 3,600 submissions pouring into Sundance.

    Asking to stop this outpouring of self-expression is like asking people to stop playing the lottery. I think this is particularly true of people in the United States. In this country people, whether from other countries, or naturally born, are inundated with the idea that they can do anything. Look at the numbers of people who think they can sing on American Idol! At 2008 the New Jersey auditions there were over 15,000 people! Imagine the rest of the country!

    The 3,600 submissions for Sundance is a fraction of the numbers of people who pray for fifteen seconds of fame on ‘Idol.’ Do we want to squelch that expression? Perhaps we do. It would be nice if people who were really good at their jobs actually liked their jobs and wanted to keep doing them, not become filmmakers.

    Still, if we were to employ this notion of “we need to make less films,” we would venture into a world of “You’re not good enough.” “You don’t really have what it takes.” “The American Dream is a lie.” The chances of this theory becoming practice is likely to be slim, particularly with our new President.

    Now, do I think that Ted is right about the number of people who are truly great filmmakers? Primarily, yes, but there is always an exception to that rule. There are filmmakers who have made one or two fantastic pictures, but who then stepped out of the game. Or there are those who make fabulous pictures who would love to continue to make great pictures, but who are not afforded the opportunity again because their movies didn’t “make money.” And, of course, there are filmmakers who have no real vision, but work well for “the man,” thus continue to have the privilege to make formulaic movies. And yes, I do ultimately believe it’s a privilege, but I also know it’s a business. If it were not a business then passion and vision would be the only ingredients needed to make movies.

    I would like to hypothesize that we are in the midst of a “Movie Revolution.” As a result, what do we actually know? In the later 1700s when the Industrial Revolution was underway, did people have any idea where they were going? They were actually inside of the industrial, economic and social transformation, blinded by the tasks before them, thus how far down the road could they actually see? How far into the future can we see? If we don’t know this, how can we begin to stop something that hasn’t really been worked out yet. Something that is really in it’s infancy stages? We are in the middle of a crowded space called autocratic expression of story telling. What is it? Where is it going? How can we truly own it? I feel we are in the throes of inventing it as I write this.

    One thing Ted points to, that I wholeheartedly agree with, is that the Internet is definitely a place where “the powers that be” will try to remove our liberty to share our visions for free. And, there will, quite likely, be censorship partnered with that cost. So, I agree that we need to ban together as a country, not just as filmmakers, to assure this freedom is not usurped from our grasp.

    What I also agree with is that we do need to know our films. I’ve been researching my new script for almost ten years on and off. I’ve written all of my other screenplays in less than a few months. What I’ve noticed is that I know this film now. I know it better than I know my family. That’s a scary thing, however I believe it to be the best work I’ve ever invested my time in. So much so, that I don’t even know who else could direct my script. It’s a feeling I’ve never experienced at this level, and I feel quite strongly, this is where we should end up when getting to know our film.

    In addition, I agree with many of the comments made about the experience of watching films in a theater. There is something profound about sharing that experience with other people, not just the experience one has alone, but as a group. Group experiences are few and far between, yet I believe we crave them. If we did not crave them, why do throngs of people stand in unity freezing their bottoms off at Giants Stadium or in D.C.? Why do people always congregate in kitchens at parties? There is something about coming together for a common purpose that’s tough to explain — although, I think “The Wisdom of Crowds” touches on some of the elements.

    So, I guess my question is why not shoot for a big picture? Isn’t a big picture something otherworldly? A spectacle? Should we not look forward to shooting stars? Or a total eclipse of the sun? Should we not find a way to go to the Great Wall of China or the Great Pyramids?

    I agree with Leo, that it’s the “experience” we go for. Is that to say that all story telling experiences must be on a giant screen – no, but why not dream about it, or shoot for it? If our reason is because of money, well, isn’t this part of how this conversation started? We shouldn’t, as filmmakers, expect to make a lot of money? Why? We may only make a few pictures in our life time. Why not be paid well for them? Should we be like painters and only get paid when we are dead and buried? (This is an entirely different blog to write on)

    If Ted is correct and we need to find a way to make less films and focus more on bringing to light the true auteurs, then how do we do it? What is the action for actually bringing this proposition to fruition? I wouldn’t begin to know how to stop people from making movies, just as I would not begin to know how to tell people, “Look, you’re chances of winning the lottery are a zillion to none, don’t waste your money on another lottery ticket!” Or, “Do not write that book; it’s a waste of your time. You’ll never get it published.”

    What kept people from making films in the past was the cost inefficiency. That’s no longer the case. I think time and repetitive rejection are the only things that will stop people from making films because it will not be money that arrests the drive. It will be a tough realization by the individual that they just don’t have “it.” And while I say this, there are always the Ed Woods and Mark Borchardts of the world…

  • Elizabeth

    Wow! I needed that. As an independent documentary producer who has made the conscious choice to utilize the internet, college/universities screenings, online media and all sorts of alternative distribution outlets – I needed a reminder that this path – though tough and challenging – is ultimately the most enduring and important. My latest project dives deeply, brutally and truthfully into the darker consequences of Hollywood fame. It’s a deliberately “outsider” project so I have no intention of waiting around for the industry to pick it up and run with it. It’s up to us not only to create but also to take responsibility for bringing our work to the audience. It’s an exciting time. Thank you for your inspiring words.

    http://www.mybigbreakmovie.com

  • danielpaulross

    Ted never argued for filmmakers to abandon the silver screen. The more attention your film receives in other mediums, the more interested people become in seeing it in a theater. Get an audience online and you’ll have an audience at the multiplex.

    Just ask Nina Paley.

  • pbsl

    you have a nice site. thanks for sharing this valuable resources. keep it up. you can also earn money from here

    http://hutmoney.blogspot.com

  • Jesus of Malibu

    Yes, there’s a profound paradigm shift, and that shift is the coming of true independence.

    We need to step back from the glamour of making all these films,

    We need to recognize the responsibility of telling unique stories in unique ways.

    Jesus of Malibu , There is no other way, this is the future this is the Revolution for the Freedom of the Mind , this is 'Transcendental Filmmaking

    http://didyoufindus.blogspot.com/

    http://tinyurl.com/39botoo

    http://tinyurl.com/3ayo3kv

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RV2YPOSHL3RKODYBMDIHBRGRPY Kris

    What are your thoughts on this particular documentary coming out this month in select cities? The film is called Dumbstruck and revolves around ventriloquism. Its hard sell theres no doubt about it but would fall in that category of independence that you mentioned!
    Heres the link to the site to see the films trailer.
    Please…Im eager to hear what you have to say.
    http://on.fb.me/gX25Dg

  • Kdevendra4

    It is important to choose right one since the first time. Thank you for the tips. hotels in Wayanad

  • Ritikyadav67

    Great information, I’ve been reading about this topic for one week now for my exams in school and thank God I found it here in your blog. I had a great time reading this Free Online Directory

  • Ritikyadav67

    fantastic to see someone who knows how to put these thoughts down so well. Great job on this.Free Website Directory

  • Rohitsingh599

    I will recommend my friends to read this. I am quite sure they will learn lots of new stuff here than anybody else! Kodaikanal

  • Rraj0057

    Mysore tourI really increased my knowledge after read your post which will be beneficial for me.

  • http://www.philippeswatches.com/ discount luxury watches

    Nice blog having nice information. some times we ignore this sort of things & also suffer a lot as well. However we can save a lot with the assistance of these tips for example time etc. discount luxury watches

  • http://manualdirectorysubmission.biz/ directory submission

    this is a very goog site to know more knowledge of net..

  • http://thelinkbuildingservices.info/ link building services

    this is a very good website….

  • http://manualdirectorysubmission.biz/ directory submission

    this website is great…

  • http://manualdirectorysubmission.biz/ directory submission

     good…

  • http://thelinkbuildingservices.info/ link building services

    fantastic to see someone who knows how to put these thoughts down so well. Great job on this 

  • http://thelinkbuildingservices.info/ link building services

    that paragraph is giving a very big example to know more and more about computer languages..

  • http://www.geizblog.de/ Book of ra

    Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be very useful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It's always nice when you.

  • http://cheat-land.com/ cheat black ops 2

    I really liked it. I was searching for such information. Thanks for sharing such an helpful post.

  • http://www.codellasolar.com/ solar installation

    This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. 

  • Rraj0057

    I keep listening to the news speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one.  Gorras Planas

  • rahul121

    It is indeed my great delight to think about your website also to appreciate your current fantastic content right here.I favor that quite definitely.I am aware which you placed considerably focus of those articles, since every one of them sound right and so are invaluable.High PR Backlinks SEO

  • rahul121

    I like all the reviews have been posted by the visitors of this site, some of them are very good suggested regard the article.Rank Page

  • rahul121

    Nowadays, finding a high quality post is really difficult. I’d like also to thank my friend for giving me the URL of your blog. Hope you appreciate my short comment.high pr link

  • rahul121

    It is nice to find a site about my interest. My first visit to your site is been a big help. Thank you for the efforts you been putting on making your site such an interesting and informative place to browse through. I'll be visiting your site again to gather some more valuable information. You truly did a good job.. Pagerank Backlinks

  • http://www.realestatesagra.com/ Agra property

    I really enjoyed what you had to say. Keep going because you definitely bring a new voice to this subject.

  • http://www.realestatesagra.com/ Agra property

    I really enjoyed what you had to say. Keep going because you definitely bring a new voice to this subject.

  • http://www.realestatesagra.com/ Agra property

    good

  • http://towautotransport.com/ Tow Auto Transport

    A beautiful and high quality information.this paper is accurate to be useful. Thanks to the author.

  • http://towautotransport.com/ Tow Auto Transport

    A beautiful and high quality information.this paper is accurate to be useful. Thanks to the author.

  • Bipinkmr20

    However we can save a lot with the assistance of these tips for example time etc. Memory Foam Mattress

  • http://geizblog.de/book-of-ra-novoline/ Book of ra

    I am interested in this topic and would like to find out some more information as my friend need information on this topic. Do you have any other articles about this?

  • Josephtaylor220

    Useful information like this one must be kept and maintained so I will put this one on my bookmark list! Thanks for this wonderful post and hoping to post more of this!

    apartments for
    sale

  • Richardsdeno

    First of all I care for the quality of your post. That was interesting to read and helpful blog & I’m looking forward to see your next thinks.
    Davis Bacon Material Handling

  • Mmunni60

    programming is not a silver bullet, but it is just too risky to assume that a single person can prevent the creation of as many bugs as a pair can.  Deine Mutter Witze MFG

  • Sahilgargmca

    To write a such kind of article is really awesome,I daily read your blogs and give my comments for that here this article is too great and so interesting.
    deine Mutter Witze

  • http://www.spielgeld-casinos.com/ spielgeld casinos

    This is my first time visit here. From the tons of comments on your articles,I guess I am not only one having all the enjoyment right here!

  • pari

    .To write a such kind of article is really amazing,I daily read your blogs and give my notice for that here this article is too great and so entertaining.

  • facebook

    Awesome blog. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work! casino bet

  • facebook

    backgammon gratis There are some attention-grabbing points in time on this article but I don?t know if I see all of them heart to heart.

  • bluecat

    2013 BLUECAT SCREENPLAY COMPETITION

    FINAL DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 15th

    Discovering & Developing Writers since 1998

    BlueCat provides two pieces of written feedback to the writer as a part of the entry fee, the only screenplay competition to do so. This ensures each screenplay is fairly judged and provided quality notes from professional readers.

    Founded and judged by award-winning screenwriter Gordy Hoffman, BlueCat has developed a keen eye for exposing screenwriting talent through our diligent and committed analysis of each submission.

    For nearly fifteen years, BlueCat’s recognition and development of undiscovered screenwriters from around the world has paved the way for many of our writers, including:

    ~ Signings by major agencies like UTA, CAA and WME.

    ~ Selling work to studios like Warner Bros, Paramount and Universal.

    ~And most importantly, seeing their work produced on the big screen.

    In nearly every occasion, the awards and honor bestowed by BlueCat proved to be the first professional acknowledgment for the writer.

    Recently, BlueCat winner THE MAN IN THE REVIEW MIRROR, by Andy Pagana and Justin Thomas, sold for low-mid six figures. And BlueCat Finalist Aaron Guzikowski’s CONTRABAND, starring Mark Wahlberg, was released by Universal.

    PRIZES

    *Grand Prize Winner -The winner of the BlueCat Screenplay will receive $10,000.

    *Finalists – Four finalists receive $2,000 each.

    *The Cordelia Award – The best screenplay from the UK will be awarded the Cordelia Award and will receive $1,000.

    *The Joplin Award – The best screenplay from outside the USA, Canada and the UK will be awarded the Joplin Award and will receive $1,000.

    FINAL DEADLINE – November 15th – $70 entry fee

    We invite you to submit your screenplay to our competition!

    SUBMIT YOUR SCREENPLAY: http://www.bluecatscreenplay.com/

    BlueCat Screenplay Competition
    Website: http://www.bluecatscreenplay.com
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bluecatpictures
    Facebook: http://facebook.com/bluecatscreenplaycompetition

  • Hannah bolton

    I Like your blog,will sharing this with my friends, excellent work.
    business phone deals

This site could not have been built without the help and insight of Michael Morgenstern. My thanks go out to him.

Help save indie film and give this guy a job in web design or film!